Past fulfilments of prophecy are sometimes used to illustrate the form that a future fulfilment of a new prophecy will take. This is especially the case in prophetic comparisons between the Fall of Jerusalem to the Babylonians in 586BC and the Fall of Jerusalem to the Romans in AD70. Similar prophetic language was used to predict each event. But this is not the same as saying that particular prophecies have had multiple fulfilments.
A final feature of Futurism is the placing of strategic multi-century gaps in sequences of prophetic predictions. These gaps are designed to remove one group of prophecies from historical fulfilment and place them into the future. The selected prophecies are 'cherry picked' to provide apparent biblical support for the Futurists' pretext for the future. The gaps are placed as follows:
- The prophet Daniel predicted that certain events would take place over a period of 490 years. Futurist place a multi-century gap between the end of year 483 and the beginning of year 484. If the gap is not inserted, then the predicted events of the last seven years can in fact be seen to have been fulfilled anyway in the period AD30 to AD37.
- Daniel also predicted that after the fall of the Roman Empire, ten kingdoms would succeed it. Futurists place a multi-century gap between the fall of Rome and the rise of these kingdoms. In fact, the ten kingdoms did appear after AD476.
- Futurists place a multi-century gap after chapter five of the book of Revelation and the remainder. History shows that in prophecies of chapter 6 onwards have in fact been fulfilled. E B Elliot's Horae Apocalyticae explains this.
Historicism therefore differs from Futurism in that it treats biblical text appropriately, seeks to explain prophesy in terms of history, does not try to impose a particular pretext for the future, and does not insert multi-century gaps in prophetic sequences.